DRY SNITCHING IS BECOMING ALL TOO COMMON FOR "MOB" CONTENT" CREATORS!!

 

This is what YouTube has become. What used to be a genre, filled with very few "in the know people," has become an all around circus, with people making up the most ludicrious assertions and adding their opinions based on hearsay.  So the question becomes, because listen not everyone is like me, but at what point are you crossing the road blinded by your own ego? Outing guys in ranks, in positions, is dry snitching.  Bottom line.  There is no value in outing someone, and many do it, and not only get it incorrect, but they also do it from the safety of their own homes, where they think they are untouchable.

Both Scott Bernstein and another content creator, have both put guys in crimes they didn't commit, invented stories that never happened, and refuse to own up to doing that. I question how they would feel if someone did that to them. So let's do that.  

There are two stories I want to tell about both of these gentlemen.  Number one, I heard a few years ago Scott had a real problem with people in Detroit, outing their meeting locations, and in fact allegedly was smacked around for it. He denied it happened, but I have been told it in fact did allegedly happen. He further made Detroit members furious because he continued to platform Gunner Lindbloom, who is a fraud.  Lindbloom made assertions for years he was in the mafia, making overtures about being related to the infamous Tocco family in Detroit, which was an out in out lie. Total fabrication.

Many of us knew way back then Gunner was a liar. He was surfing to peddle his books, shirts, and mob background, even though he never actually had one.  Scott intentionally lied to everyone for years, puffing Lindbloom up onto some imaginary pedestal.  He finally would admit, he lied for years trying to help Gunner establish his "character".  The problem is, the way I heard it, and the way Scott described it was, that certain people in Detroit were getting very angry about the Gunner debacle.  It was only then Scott admitted on Lee Cole III Podcast, that he in fact LIED.  How's that for credibility?  

The second blatant lie Scott had circulated, is that there was a wedding down in South Philly.  The wedding was a "mob wedding," and Scott told his readers that at this wedding a mob "Capo" seated everyone in the reception room according to rank and by family.  The problem with that story is, the "Capo" in question does NOT HAVE A DAUGHTER."  Another lie by Bernstein he perpetuated from somewhere.  I did, reach out to Scott after talking to someone to explain that he was completely wrong, but he didn't ever respond, and I know why.  

So my question to you is, why does anyone believe him to be credible?  He's not.  That's the problem. Rumor and gossip are simply that, and I can tell you specifically nobody in Philadelphia would ever say hello to Scott, or acknowledge his existence.  He's been mad ever since, well, the way I heard it anyway, that allegedly Joey Merlino, refused to have anything to do with him, and since then all he's done is say negative things about Joey.  

The other content creator is of the same ilk.  Recently he put up content about someone in Howard Beach, New York, which was utterly incorrect, wrong, and slanderous.  The person in question, made one phone call and suddenly that post went down.  These people invent stories, without doing any factual backgrounds, and certainly don't use FACTS to back up their narratives.  This creator was once allegedly chased out of South Philadelphia for calling a Pagan motorcycle members old lady a "WHORE."  He hasn't been back since.   He also was slapped around publicly, for talking about guys in certain circles. He's another one, who's put countless guys on murders they either weren't involved in, or were in prison at the time. He has also, interviewed wife beaters and child killers without any reservations or morality.  The facts don't matter, more the futility and drama of it all leads him to conclusions that are utterly, and flat out inaccurate.  He has repeatedly slandered the memory of John Gotti by inserting lies based on those of informants and not which is actual information, out of hatred and spite for John Gotti's daughter. That's not factual, it's personal. You lose ALL credibility when you do that, not that you truly ever had it to begin with.  Numbers aren't credibility. Acumen is.

Together the two are a walking gossip session.  Neither has proof, rather some weirdo fantasy about what they think is going on, whereas guys on the street and those that do frequent areas, will tell you how off based they are.  I've said it before, it's better they get it wrong, but you have to question how without any proof, they can sit there with a straight face and invent things, without a care in the world as to what that does to the men they are talking about, their families, their children, and friends.  Perhaps the bigger injustice is that the FBI is listening.  

It's no secret the FBI listens to the mob genre shows.  They are looking for intel wherever they can get it these days, and the FBI is no stranger to inventing scenarios that don't exist.  Remember when they blamed Gene Gotti for the murder of Francesco Cali? I do.  It was nonsense then just as it is now, but it didn't stop one of those creators from accusing Gene Gotti for months.  I also say do your due diligence, and if you don't have sources, say so, say it's your opinion, but they won't.  They want you to believe they know what's going on, and I can tell you for a fact, they don't.   They have no respect for anyone, and they certainly don't mind expressing thoughts and trying to make them facts.

To me, it's dry snitching.  Showing family photos of these guys, giving them some rank like they are pirates, and putting them into a structure they don't understand or know very well. That's the problem with the circus these days, the monkeys are running the zoo. As creators, journalists, whatever you want to label yourself you have a right to say whatever you want, but you don't have a right to slander people, put people's good names into murder charges, and crimes, without having any proof of such, but yet both of these two do it like clockwork. That's not "content," is gossip from wash-women nothing more, nothing less.