GRAVANO ALLEGEDLY PAID SIX FIGURES AND GOT PLASTIC SURGERY IN RETURN FOR INTERVIEW
If you haven't heard, it pays to be Salvatore "The Shits" Gravano. While many people have been trolling YouTube with the plague taking over the United States, they have come across Gravano's interview on YouTube with Valuetainment's Patrick Bet-David. A lot of you, including myself watched the interview. While we can argue both valid points to his interview, what I've found out, is that Gravano was paid between $75,000-$100,000 dollars in conjunction with payment for plastic surgery. I cannot and will not divulge where that information was acquired from, what I can tell you is, the source, is impeccable, and what I'm saying according to the person who told me, would be one of the only people to know about that deal.
What you will say is, so what, why shouldn't he get paid. Well, the problem with that is that Son Of Sam laws prohibit that. You cannot make money off your crimes, and that's what Gravano has been doing since Peter Maas wrote "Underboss," with Salvatore Gravano. Son of Sam Law states that "Any law, designed to keep criminals from profiting from the publicity of their crimes, often by selling their stories to publishers. Such laws authorize the state to seize money earned from deals such as book/movie biographies and paid interviews and use it to compensate the criminals victims."
I personally don't care for Gravano or anything he stands for. While I have stated on the record many times he was a gangster and earner, and everything in between, my particular issue with him goes way beyond becoming an informant for the Justice Department. While I turn my nose at the governments willingness to kiss Gravano's ass for the sake of putting John Gotti in prison, what remains my mitigating factor is what happened to Alan Kaiser.
Gravano admitted to killing 19 people. One of them was his own brother in law Nick Scibetta. Everyone wants to focus on the archetype of Gravano. His earning capabilities and his prowess for killing people. They want to treat him like a king because of his past. I've seen it all over social media. The problem is, someone is getting lost behind in all of this and that's the Kaiser family. With no disrespect to other families, but Alan was just a kid.
1977, Brooklyn, New York. Alan is just finishing up walking his girlfriend home. He was 16 years old. As he was walking along, he witnessed Louie Milito and Salvatore Gravano doing a drive by. Not long after, Gravano and Milito pulled over adjacent to Alan. They lured him towards the car, and shot gunned him to death and left him laying in the streets. Alan was a kid, a gifted artist, a boy scout and hadn't lived even a quarter of the life Gravano had. Alan was shot in the chest and head. Why?
No reason. It was a case in mistaken identity. For 20 years the Kasier family had no idea what happened to their son, brother, and cousin. It wasn't until the F.B.I. knocked on the Kaiser home to inform them that Salvatore Gravano did the murder with Louie Milito, but because he was in the witness protection program, they couldn't do anything about it.
I've never agreed with that. Never. The morality of the feds simply disgusts me in this case. They didn't do anything because the last thing they needed any judge or jury to hear about is him killing an innocent child. Gotti was too big a target for them to risk screwing it up. It's my belief they knew about it from day one and just kept a lid on it, for the sake of the case against Gotti.
Gravano is a dog. I don't care what anyone says or thinks. Put the gangster stuff aside for a minute. How many other gangsters can you name that killed kids? The one exception to that would likely be Anthony "Gaspipe" Casso, who in similar fashion killed the wrong person too. What makes Casso interesting is that he told the feds that Gravano was dealing drugs. Something Gravano denied to the federal government time and time again. That's ultimately why the feds tore up Casso's cooperation agreement and buried him in the prison bowels.
For Casso to speak out against the government's start slug, and make him look bad was a bad thing for the feds. Rather then do their jobs, they instead made wild claims that Casso was beating up people in prison, causing problems with the hacks, and other various but yet amusing tales. The bottom line was, Casso was making Gravano and the feds look really bad, and that's why they fucked Casso.
Made in Staten Island came out, and Staten Island didn't like it. Staten Island is still a mob enclave. Why on earth Karen Gravano thought her "fantasy/reality show" would work is beyond me. Scripted and laughable, the show didn't last as Staten Island was stand up and put pressure on MTV to shut it down. It likely helped that the show had beyond tepid ratings. Now, it's Karen Gravano part 2, with her infamous lizard looking father. The new show is the same garbage, with one difference this time it's Salvatore Gravano giving advice to kids. Imagine that, he's giving advice to the same age of kids he killed back in 1977. It's repulsive in every sense. I hope MTV knows what Son Of Sam laws are, but then again, the shows Gravano produces with MTV are garbage to begin with, so I don't expect the second incarnation of this shit show to work either.
The fact that Maas, who was I believed sued for $400,000 and lost, because of the Son of Sam Laws, and the fact that Patrick Bet-David paid Gravano, is pretty disgusting. While Patrick Bet-David has a personality like a wet napkin and asks the most borderline questions, we have to ask ourselves one question. Let's put aside Gravano being a rat, and a drug dealer. Let's put aside that he looks like he just popped out of the dirt at a cemetery. The one question is, how can Bet-David pay that guy for living off his crimes, and get away with it? Why even pay him? While Bet-David does actually do good interviews, and I am sure he will deny he paid Gravano, which I know will be a bold faced lie and I can prove it, it just sort of makes me sick why he didn't ask the tough questions. Why has nobody asked Gravano about the murder of Alan Kaiser. He felt so "bad about killing " Milito, it "Broke him in half," yet no mention of snuffing out a 16 year old. If MTV, and Bet-David don't know that, they are living under a very jaded pile of shit. They know, they just don't want to push that narrative because the money maker in interviewing Gravano is more important to them, then making a stand for what's right.
The least you can do, is pose the question to Karen too. She has made a living off her fathers name and reputation, not her own. She has slammed other mobsters families at will, but never seems to mention the fact that her father killed a kid. What if someone killed her daughter at that age? How would she feel? She wouldn't and that's the problem with MTV, Bet-David and the Gravano's in general. Karen cannot use the "my father only killed gangsters line," when it comes to Alan, so they avoid it every single time. So enjoy the money lizard man, and enjoy the plastic surgery, however you might wanna get a refund because if the best they can do is make you look like an updated version of the crypt keeper, you've picked the wrong doctor.
What you will say is, so what, why shouldn't he get paid. Well, the problem with that is that Son Of Sam laws prohibit that. You cannot make money off your crimes, and that's what Gravano has been doing since Peter Maas wrote "Underboss," with Salvatore Gravano. Son of Sam Law states that "Any law, designed to keep criminals from profiting from the publicity of their crimes, often by selling their stories to publishers. Such laws authorize the state to seize money earned from deals such as book/movie biographies and paid interviews and use it to compensate the criminals victims."
I personally don't care for Gravano or anything he stands for. While I have stated on the record many times he was a gangster and earner, and everything in between, my particular issue with him goes way beyond becoming an informant for the Justice Department. While I turn my nose at the governments willingness to kiss Gravano's ass for the sake of putting John Gotti in prison, what remains my mitigating factor is what happened to Alan Kaiser.
Gravano admitted to killing 19 people. One of them was his own brother in law Nick Scibetta. Everyone wants to focus on the archetype of Gravano. His earning capabilities and his prowess for killing people. They want to treat him like a king because of his past. I've seen it all over social media. The problem is, someone is getting lost behind in all of this and that's the Kaiser family. With no disrespect to other families, but Alan was just a kid.
1977, Brooklyn, New York. Alan is just finishing up walking his girlfriend home. He was 16 years old. As he was walking along, he witnessed Louie Milito and Salvatore Gravano doing a drive by. Not long after, Gravano and Milito pulled over adjacent to Alan. They lured him towards the car, and shot gunned him to death and left him laying in the streets. Alan was a kid, a gifted artist, a boy scout and hadn't lived even a quarter of the life Gravano had. Alan was shot in the chest and head. Why?
No reason. It was a case in mistaken identity. For 20 years the Kasier family had no idea what happened to their son, brother, and cousin. It wasn't until the F.B.I. knocked on the Kaiser home to inform them that Salvatore Gravano did the murder with Louie Milito, but because he was in the witness protection program, they couldn't do anything about it.
I've never agreed with that. Never. The morality of the feds simply disgusts me in this case. They didn't do anything because the last thing they needed any judge or jury to hear about is him killing an innocent child. Gotti was too big a target for them to risk screwing it up. It's my belief they knew about it from day one and just kept a lid on it, for the sake of the case against Gotti.
Anthony Casso |
For Casso to speak out against the government's start slug, and make him look bad was a bad thing for the feds. Rather then do their jobs, they instead made wild claims that Casso was beating up people in prison, causing problems with the hacks, and other various but yet amusing tales. The bottom line was, Casso was making Gravano and the feds look really bad, and that's why they fucked Casso.
Made in Staten Island came out, and Staten Island didn't like it. Staten Island is still a mob enclave. Why on earth Karen Gravano thought her "fantasy/reality show" would work is beyond me. Scripted and laughable, the show didn't last as Staten Island was stand up and put pressure on MTV to shut it down. It likely helped that the show had beyond tepid ratings. Now, it's Karen Gravano part 2, with her infamous lizard looking father. The new show is the same garbage, with one difference this time it's Salvatore Gravano giving advice to kids. Imagine that, he's giving advice to the same age of kids he killed back in 1977. It's repulsive in every sense. I hope MTV knows what Son Of Sam laws are, but then again, the shows Gravano produces with MTV are garbage to begin with, so I don't expect the second incarnation of this shit show to work either.
The fact that Maas, who was I believed sued for $400,000 and lost, because of the Son of Sam Laws, and the fact that Patrick Bet-David paid Gravano, is pretty disgusting. While Patrick Bet-David has a personality like a wet napkin and asks the most borderline questions, we have to ask ourselves one question. Let's put aside Gravano being a rat, and a drug dealer. Let's put aside that he looks like he just popped out of the dirt at a cemetery. The one question is, how can Bet-David pay that guy for living off his crimes, and get away with it? Why even pay him? While Bet-David does actually do good interviews, and I am sure he will deny he paid Gravano, which I know will be a bold faced lie and I can prove it, it just sort of makes me sick why he didn't ask the tough questions. Why has nobody asked Gravano about the murder of Alan Kaiser. He felt so "bad about killing " Milito, it "Broke him in half," yet no mention of snuffing out a 16 year old. If MTV, and Bet-David don't know that, they are living under a very jaded pile of shit. They know, they just don't want to push that narrative because the money maker in interviewing Gravano is more important to them, then making a stand for what's right.
Gravano, 2020 |
Comments
Post a Comment